Surviving Islamism ... And Right/Left Politics: Churchill's Principle - Part IV: On Politics & Nazis  by Peter Carl
CHURCHILL'S "PRINCIPLE" AND A COMMON IDEOLOGY OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND WESTERN FREEDOMS: WHAT THE OSLO MASSACRES TELL US ABOUT RIGHT/LEFT POLITICS AND THE PRESENT AND FUTURE OF THE COUNTER-JIHAD MOVEMENT
In this, his fourth in a series of six essays, Peter Carl examines the urgency of the situation of the West and the reasons why Churchill's Principle says indisputably that there is no longer time for ideological polemics. The future is now, says Peter Carl, and it's not pretty. He peers into post-Breivik electoral politics across Northern and Central Europe as well as at the realities of the "Left"/"Right" situation, offering a glimpse into some of the changes that have occurred due to Breivik's massacres. He also considers how a poorly crafted message on the part of the Movement has, for many outside of it, now made the use of the "Nazi" label seem ever more justified. Looking back to World War II and the Nazi collaboration with Islam then, the author considers the polemics and realities of the word Nazi then and now, which both history and present politics show has left the general public, the media, and governmental authorities terribly misguided - and the Movement itself sorely damaged.
Churchill's Principle - Part IV: On Politics & Nazis
Across the West, as Churchill put it in the quotes that preface Part I of these essays, for the few who "…see things in their true proportion…" - including especially the self-defeating destructiveness of "Left"/"Right" polemics in the context of the Counter-Jihad Movement and Breivik's purposeful and horrendous attacks on seventy-seven wholly-innocent people, on this Movement, and on all Westerners - the future does not look extremely bright. As I have laid out in Part I, Part II, and Part III of these essays, in the case these present patterns of "Left"/"Right" antagonism and lack of unity of vision continue to cause the Counter-Jihad Movement to alienate large numbers of its potential voters, to self-inflictedly and publicly paint itself as "Right-wing", and, as a result, to fail to succeed in gaining political majorities in national assemblies across the West (or at least changing the thoughts of other political parties on issues of Islamization and irrational immigration), the situation across both the West and the Muslim world as well is only destined to become far bleaker.
The reasons for this are adequately apparent. The facts are well-recognized. Birth rates far below replacement levels for Europeans and extremely high immigration and birth rates among Muslims make for much of the difference. Worldwide, the Muslim population is predicted to double to 2.2 billion by 2030. In Europe, however, the writing is already very much on the wall. In England, the Muslim population is increasing at a rate ten (10) times faster than that of the rest of the population. In Oslo, Norway, forty-three percent (43%) of all of Oslo's schools already have a non-Norwegian speaking majority population. In France the number of mosques has doubled to over 2,000 in just the past ten (10) years and, as should not surprise anyone, a new study shows that Muslims in France are intentionally segregating themselves from the rest of the country to the country's detriment. The small city of Hagen, Germany is evidence of both the present and the future all rolled into one; its downtown now has its third "Grand Mosque" while the Lutheran Church there is slated to be abandoned. In Sweden, a leading clergyman has suggested that Sweden begin demolishing the majority of its churches; in France Muslims have requested religious use of the country's less used and vacant churches. According to the father of terrorism research, Walter Laqueur, due to birthrates and rampant Islamism the continent of Europe is already well on its way to becoming a part of the Islamist's Ummah. The situation in the United States, though still far less serious in terms of numbers, is tracking these patterns found in Europe and elsewhere.
[....]
The full article can be read at The Brussels Journal (http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4875)
About the Author
The author, writing under the pseudonym Peter Carl, is an independent non-partisan advisor to a sitting American congressperson and a strategic political researcher and consultant on international and comparative political and public policy issues. He is also a member of the American Committees on Foreign Relations. The author maintains contacts with numerous present and former ambassadors from both the U.S. and European countries, a number of whom are serving or have served in the Middle East. Similarly, he also maintains contacts with present and formerly elected representatives from parties across the political spectrum who have been elected to the U.S. Congress, the EU Parliament, and various national parliaments within Europe. Fluent in five languages and possessing elementary abilities in others, the author was trained and works as an international attorney and possesses a Masters Degree in Public Policy from the top-ranked public affairs program in the United States.
Legal Research Journal / Zionist war on Islam.
Tags: islam journal, islam journal of business research, islam journal of economic surveys, islam journalism book, islam journalist hostage, islam journalistic integrity, islamic journal articles, islamic journal knowledge, islamic journal online, islamic journalist